Site Feedback

  • 600.6K Views
  • 5.7K Replies
13 YrsFIGN Plus!$#
abatage
Coach
#2651
's Avatar
13 YrsFIGN Plus!$#
Replying to Everdred
knew I should have included my browser - I'm using Opera on Win7 at 1080... if that helps
typically it's the same as Chrome though =)
11 Yrs$#
tiamat911
Moderator
#2652
's Avatar
11 Yrs$#
I don't have an issue using Firefox 76 in Windows 10. This is what it looks like on my end. All the emblems fit nicely under abatage's avatar.

User Image
10 Yrs#
Eries
#2653
's Avatar
10 Yrs#
Replying to abatage
I´m using Opera as well, but you look normal to me. At least on Win10 at 4k.
14 YrsF#
Everdred
Staff
#2654
's Avatar
14 YrsF#
Replying to abatage
Should be good now. And allow for 10 Yrs.
13 YrsFIGN Plus!$#
abatage
Coach
#2655
's Avatar
13 YrsFIGN Plus!$#
Replying to Eries
hmmm interesting... maybe it's just one of those "me" things...

I also tried it on my phone for comparison - loaded the desktop site using Opera mobile and still got the same (off-centre) layout
if it helps my phone is 1440p, but I don't think it would be a resolution thing anyway
13 YrsFIGN Plus!$#
abatage
Coach
#2656
's Avatar
13 YrsFIGN Plus!$#
Replying to Everdred
haha yep it looks fine again =)
another niggle bites the dust - thanks

edit: looks like you added 10px to the overall width - it must just be one of those weird things where margins/etc render differently in certain scenarios - used to drive me crazy when I worked on web sites.. thanks again.. always a pleasure!
14 YrsF#
Everdred
Staff
#2657
's Avatar
14 YrsF#
Replying to GamerAim
This has been fixed too!
7 Yrs#
Son_of_a_Pitch
#2658
's Avatar
7 Yrs#
I was wondering if we should or could add the little replay symbol to the games on the recently completed list on our front pages?
7 Yrs$#
lowdefal
Modified
#2659
's Avatar
7 Yrs$#
Quoted Post No Longer Exists
I'm not sure Everdred has actually commented on this directly but it was suggested recently. It's the sort of feature that is sometimes unannounced/uncommented on until it's implemented.
11 Yrs$#
uvehj
#2660
's Avatar
11 Yrs$#
Post preview and editing is breaks "\". Since you need to write 2 (one to escape the second) while previewing or editing a post the first "\" disappears and you need to go back and add it back each time you preview the post. Same with editing, you need to remember to add back a second "\" for each of them or they won't be escaped and they won't appear in the post.
14 YrsF#
Everdred
Staff
#2661
's Avatar
14 YrsF#
Replying to uvehj
Should be fixed now.
11 Yrs$#
uvehj
#2662
's Avatar
11 Yrs$#
Replying to Everdred
Thanks for the quick fix!
I've tested it a bit and it seems to be working right :)
11 Yrs$#
uvehj
#2663
's Avatar
11 Yrs$#
Quoted Post No Longer Exists
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
14 YrsF#
Everdred
Staff
#2664
's Avatar
14 YrsF#
Quoted Post No Longer Exists
I'm sorry to destroy your business model but things were getting out of hand.
10 Yrs#
GamerAim
Squashed
#2665
's Avatar
10 Yrs#
Replying to Everdred
Everdred is the Progressive candidate we need to stamp out unfettered capitalism.
14 YrsF#
Everdred
Staff
#2666
's Avatar
14 YrsF#
I'm working on new admin tools for blocking PMs right now.
12 Yrs#
NinjaRic
Casted
#2667
's Avatar
12 Yrs#
Replying to Everdred
Yeah the way he was in the forums I expected way more than that. Something to be thankful for I guess. The dumb thing is I totally get where he's coming from, and if it weren't so much extra effort for such minimal gain I think it could be useful to be able to see the base and GOTY main game times collated. It's a shame he couldn't get his head around that or the arguments against his position.

On topic, someone mentioned having a toggle for letting all/only friends/nobody send you PMs, which I think would be an elegant solution as well as or instead of a block button
14 YrsF#
Everdred
Staff
#2668
's Avatar
14 YrsF#
Replying to NinjaRic
That's what's unfortunate. There are things we could discuss on improvements but he got so hostile. Also, creating multiple unnecessary threads.
14 YrsF#
Everdred
Staff
#2669
's Avatar
14 YrsF#
I've cleaned up this thread, not to hide anything but to keep it on track.

To sum it up, chez_blunts was banned for abusive behavior.
14 YrsF#
Everdred
Staff
#2670
's Avatar
14 YrsF#
Site Update

Private Message Control:
- PMs now match your profile privacy - Everyone/Friends/Private
- - - Your privacy option must be the equivalent of the person you are PMing otherwise you will be denied.
- - - Existing conversations can continue regardless of your privacy options. Use "Delete PMs" to leave the conversation and fall back to privacy rules.
- I now have the ability to revoke all PM permissions from a single user
10 Yrs#
GamerAim
Squashed
#2671
's Avatar
10 Yrs#
Replying to Everdred
Are deleted PMs deleted for both users? I'm just wondering if the second feature could let a private user PM other users without letting them reply back. Seems easily exploited by bad actors if so.

Not to mention that I oppose such one-sided restrictions to begin with - I think that private users shouldn't even be allowed to view anyone's public profiles. But that's just my one-track dedication to complete transparency, neutrality and equality.
14 YrsF#
Everdred
Staff
#2672
's Avatar
14 YrsF#
Replying to GamerAim
No, conversations are only deleted locally. It allows you to stop the conversation whenever you'd like.

Obviously a per person block would be nice, but that's not there yet.
10 Yrs#
GamerAim
Squashed
#2673
's Avatar
10 Yrs#
Replying to Everdred
None of these options would immediately stop me from PMing someone set to friends-only (provided we're friends), would it? I have an open conversation with a friends-only user and don't want to suggest you make a change that forces up to stop chatting.

I do wonder if we have any Private users who do use PMs? Hopefully they speak up so we can get both sides.
14 YrsF#
Everdred
Staff
#2674
's Avatar
14 YrsF#
Replying to GamerAim
Yeah, friends are always assumed OK. You would unfriend them if not.

EDIT: That's actually a lie. The privacy stuff is lifted directly from profile privacy. Private means no one, friends means friends, public means everyone.

The only difference here is that it opens up PMs to be viewable when someone more locked down sends a message to a open person.
13 YrsFIGN Plus!$#
abatage
Coach
#2675
's Avatar
13 YrsFIGN Plus!$#
Replying to Everdred
If it's possible, I think opening up PMs between people listed as friends would be a good option - might be a good way to 'gate' PM conversations for those that want it as well, rather than a blanket 'block' because of profile visibility. Although, I'm not sure how many people are active on the forum and/or PMs while having a private profile, but I have to think there would be some.

At the least I think it's good to have some mechanism for choosing to end contact with someone, which seems to be in the mix anyway so right on!
Login